@acala-network/sdk
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:lodash | AI (phantom-deps): lodash is a declared runtime dep; phantom-dep heuristic fires due to monorepo config references, not a real issue. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:graphql | AI (phantom-deps): graphql is a declared runtime dep; same monorepo config false-positive pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@acala-network/api | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dep declared in both dependencies and peerDependencies; phantom-dep heuristic is a false positive here. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.15 | 11 / 5 | |
| 4.1.14 | 11 / 5 | |
| 4.1.13 | 11 / 5 | |
| 4.1.12 | 11 / 5 | |
| 4.1.11 | 11 / 5 | |
| 4.1.10 | 11 / 5 |
v4.1.14
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (aniiantt) than the most recent previously approved version (qwer951123) on 2025-05-03, but aniiantt is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.1.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.1.12
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (qwer951123) than the most recent previously approved version (xlc) on 2025-03-13, but qwer951123 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.1.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.1.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.