@adaline/custom
Adaline Custom Provider
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@adaline/types | AI (dependencies): First-party monorepo sibling dependency; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@adaline/provider | AI (dependencies): First-party monorepo sibling dependency; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all 40 published versions; no provenance is the norm for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 22 of 22)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7.11 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.7.9 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.7.8 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.7.5 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.7.4 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.5.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.4.2 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.4.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.4.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.3.2 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.3.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.3.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.5 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.4 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.3 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.2 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.2.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.1.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.1.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.0.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.0.0 | 4 / 2 |
v1.7.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.