← Home

@adguard/scriptlets

AdGuard's JavaScript library of Scriptlets and Redirect resources

21
Versions
GPL-3.0
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

ameshkovmaximtopblakhard

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): maximtop is an AdGuard team member with 3656 approved packages and 0 rejected — consistent with an internal org maintainer transition, not a compromise. ai
license copyleft-license:GPL-3.0 AI (license): AdGuard Scriptlets has always been GPL-3.0 licensed; this is the project's intended license, not a security concern. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@types/trusted-types AI (phantom-deps): @types/trusted-types is a TypeScript type definition used at compile time; declaring it as a runtime dep is a common pattern and poses no security risk for this package. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Established AdGuard package with 91 versions and clear GitHub repo; lack of Sigstore provenance is not a meaningful risk signal here. ai

Versions (showing 21 of 21)

Version Deps Published
2.4.2 3 / 63
2.4.1 3 / 63
2.3.1 3 / 63
2.3.0 3 / 63
2.2.16 3 / 63
2.2.15 3 / 63
2.2.14 3 / 63
2.2.13 3 / 63
2.2.12 3 / 63
2.2.11 3 / 63
2.2.10 3 / 63
2.2.9 3 / 63
2.2.8 3 / 63
2.2.7 3 / 63
2.2.6 3 / 63
2.2.5 3 / 63
2.2.4 3 / 63
2.2.3 3 / 63
2.2.2 3 / 63
2.2.1 3 / 63
2.2.0 2 / 64

v2.4.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.4.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.3.1

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: ameshkov → maximtop (on 2026-03-24) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-24. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.3.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: ameshkov → maximtop (on 2026-03-18) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-18. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.16

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: ameshkov → maximtop (on 2026-02-19) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-02-19. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.15

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: ameshkov → maximtop (on 2026-01-22) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-01-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.14

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: ameshkov → maximtop (on 2025-12-16) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-12-16. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.13

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.2.12

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.