@asphalt-react/data-viz
data-viz is a comprehensive charting library tailored to fulfill diverse visualization requirements.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| license | uncommon-license:UNLICENSED | AI (license): Proprietary Gojek DLS package; UNLICENSED is intentional and consistent across the @asphalt-react namespace. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@visx/vendor | AI (phantom-deps): @visx/vendor is explicitly declared as a runtime dependency; phantom-dep heuristic is a false positive here. | ai |
Versions (showing 14 of 14)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15.2 | 16 / 2 | |
| 2.15.1 | 16 / 2 | |
| 2.15.0 | 16 / 2 | |
| 2.14.0 | 16 / 2 | |
| 2.12.2 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.12.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.11.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.10.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.9.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.8.1 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.8.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.7.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 2.6.0 | 16 / 2 | |
| 2.5.0 | 16 / 2 |
v2.15.2
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (antoniomontana) than the most recent previously approved version (elayudhanira-gojek) on 2026-05-25, but antoniomontana is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.15.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.14.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.12.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.12.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.11.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.10.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.