@atlaskit/editor-palette
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Atlassian publishes their atlaskit packages without Sigstore provenance; this is consistent across their entire package ecosystem and not a risk indicator. | ai |
Versions (showing 26 of 26)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.26 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.25 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.24 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.23 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.22 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.21 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.20 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.19 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.18 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.17 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.16 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.15 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.14 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.13 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.12 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.11 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.10 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.9 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.8 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.7 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.6 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.5 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.4 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.3 | 3 / 3 | |
| 2.1.2 | 3 / 3 |
v2.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.26
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.