← Home

@atproto-labs/xrpc-utils

11
Versions
License
No
Install Scripts
Verified
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

SLSA provenance attestation npm registry signatures No source commit

Maintainers

devinivyestrattonbaileydholms

Keywords

atprotonodexrpcserverutilitiescontentnegotiation

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions CI publishing for bluesky-social/atproto monorepo; backed by SLSA provenance attestation. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-removed AI (maintainer-change): Maintainer removal consistent with org-level CI/CD publishing migration for the atproto monorepo. ai
publish-pattern dormant-publish AI (publish-pattern): Dormancy followed by CI/CD migration is a known pattern for monorepo packages; SLSA attestation confirms legitimate origin. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Official atproto monorepo package; lack of provenance is consistent across all versions and not a risk indicator here. ai

Versions (showing 11 of 11)

Version Deps Published
0.1.0 2 / 1
0.0.24 2 / 1
0.0.23 2 / 1
0.0.22 2 / 1
0.0.21 2 / 1
0.0.20 2 / 1
0.0.19 2 / 1
0.0.18 2 / 1
0.0.17 2 / 1
0.0.16 2 / 1
0.0.15 2 / 1

v0.1.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: devinivy → GitHub Actions (on 2026-05-19) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-19. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO Has SLSA provenance attestation provenance

Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.

v0.0.24

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.23

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.22

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.21

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.20

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.19

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.18

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.17

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.16

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.0.15

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.