@backstage/errors
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:cross-fetch | AI (phantom-deps): Likely used in bundled dist build; benign for this established monorepo package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@backstage/types | AI (dependencies): @backstage/types is a first-party Backstage monorepo package; stable dependency for all @backstage/* packages. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Backstage packages historically lack Sigstore provenance; absence is not a risk signal for this well-established org package. | ai |
Versions (showing 17 of 17)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3.1 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.3.0 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.7 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.6 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.5 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.4 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.3 | 2 / 1 | |
| 1.2.2 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.2.1 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.2.0 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.5 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.4 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.3 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.2 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.1 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.0 | 3 / 2 |
v1.2.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.