@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-gerrit
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Backstage monorepo sub-packages routinely lack keywords and detailed READMEs; this is a structural pattern of the monorepo, not a spam indicator. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Backstage monorepo package with 865 days history and 814 versions; lack of Sigstore provenance is consistent with their existing publish pipeline. | ai |
Versions (showing 13 of 13)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2.21 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.20 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.19 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.18 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.17 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.16 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.15 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.14 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.13 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.12 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.11 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.10 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.9 | 6 / 4 |
v0.2.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.