@bearlab/switch
Bearlab UI Switch Component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Monorepo component; provenance attestation is a best-practice recommendation, not a security blocker. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@bearlab/popover | AI (dependencies): Same-org monorepo sibling dependency; consistent with @bearlab UI component library pattern. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@bearlab/view-error | AI (dependencies): Same-org monorepo sibling dependency; consistent with @bearlab UI component library pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@bearlab/popover | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; phantom detection is a false positive in this build setup. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@bearlab/view-error | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; phantom detection is a false positive in this build setup. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:classnames | AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files; common false positive for build-time usage patterns. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 3 / 0 |
v1.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.