@bearlab/textarea
Bearlab UI Textarea Component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all @bearlab packages; no provenance is common and not a risk signal here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:classnames | AI (phantom-deps): Bundled component library; classnames likely consumed at build time or tree-shaken, not directly imported. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@bearlab/view-error | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dep; likely re-exported or used indirectly in built dist output. | ai |
Versions (showing 17 of 17)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 2 / 0 |
v1.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.