@beatbax/engine
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/chips/gameboy/songWizard.js | AI (source-diff): Long lines are base64-encoded PNG image data in a string constant, not obfuscated executable code. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/chips/gameboy/songWizard.d.ts | AI (source-diff): Same base64 PNG constant in the TypeScript declaration file; not obfuscated code. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:standardized-audio-context | AI (dependencies): standardized-audio-context is a well-known Web Audio API polyfill; appropriate and expected dependency for an audio engine package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Provenance absence is common (~88% of npm); no other risk signals present for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 25 of 25)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.16.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 0.15.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 0.14.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 0.13.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.13.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.13.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.12.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.11.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.11.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.11.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.10.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.10.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.9.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.8.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.6.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.5.5 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.5.3 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.5.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.5.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.5.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.4.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.3.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.2.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.1.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 1 |
v0.16.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.15.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.14.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.1
3 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.11.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.11.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.10.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.5.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.