@cabloy/localeutil
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Cabloy monorepo utility; mass-production and sparse-metadata signals are expected for this publisher's package family. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.1.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.1.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.1.2 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.1.1 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.0.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.3 | 0 / 2 | |
| 2.0.2 | 0 / 2 |
v2.1.5
2 findingsMatched 4 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'zhennann' owns 250 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_README_NO_CODE] Short README with no code block, no install instructions, and no usage/API section. • [S_NO_REPO_NO_HOME] No repository, homepage, or bugs URL — genuine packages almost always link somewhere. • [S_NO_DEPS] No runtime, dev, peer, or optional dependencies declared.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.4
2 findingsMatched 4 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'zhennann' owns 250 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_README_NO_CODE] Short README with no code block, no install instructions, and no usage/API section. • [S_NO_REPO_NO_HOME] No repository, homepage, or bugs URL — genuine packages almost always link somewhere. • [S_NO_DEPS] No runtime, dev, peer, or optional dependencies declared.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.11
2 findingsMatched 4 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'zhennann' owns 250 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_README_NO_CODE] Short README with no code block, no install instructions, and no usage/API section. • [S_NO_REPO_NO_HOME] No repository, homepage, or bugs URL — genuine packages almost always link somewhere. • [S_NO_DEPS] No runtime, dev, peer, or optional dependencies declared.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.