@calcom/embed-react
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Benign publish-env change; no malicious behavior on an established first-party package. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New dep is same-org @calcom/embed-core, expected for this component. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@calcom/embed-snippet | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package from calcom monorepo; phantom dep pattern is expected in bundled monorepo packages. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Cal.com is a well-known open-source project; lack of Sigstore provenance is common and not a security concern here. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE | AI (license): Standard SPDX expression used by Cal.com across their packages; not a security concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 25 of 25)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5.3 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.5.2 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.5.1 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.5.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.4.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.3.2 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.3.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.2.2 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.2.1 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.2.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.1.1 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.1.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.0.12 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.0.11 | 2 / 8 | |
| 1.0.10 | 2 / 7 | |
| 1.0.9 | 2 / 7 | |
| 1.0.8 | 2 / 7 | |
| 1.0.7 | 2 / 7 | |
| 1.0.6 | 2 / 7 | |
| 1.0.5 | 1 / 7 | |
| 1.0.4 | 3 / 5 | |
| 1.0.3 | 2 / 6 | |
| 1.0.2 | 2 / 6 | |
| 1.0.1 | 1 / 2 | |
| 1.0.0 | 0 / 2 |
v1.5.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: iambalhara.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: iambalhara.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: iambalhara.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: iambalhara.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: iambalhara.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.