@cedarjs/ogimage-gen
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Monorepo package; description often omitted in workspace packages. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Provenance adoption is ~12% across npm; not a disqualifier for established packages. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@cedarjs/web | AI (dependencies): Sibling monorepo package at matching version; not an independent risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@cedarjs/router | AI (dependencies): Sibling monorepo package at matching version; not an independent risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@cedarjs/internal | AI (dependencies): Sibling monorepo package at matching version; not an independent risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@cedarjs/project-config | AI (dependencies): Sibling monorepo package at matching version; not an independent risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 27)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 4.1.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 4.0.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 3.1.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 3.1.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 3.0.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.8.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.8.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.7.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.6.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.5.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.5.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.4.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.4.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.3.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.2.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.2.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.1.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.1.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.0.3 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.0.2 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.0.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 2.0.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 1.1.2 | 8 / 7 | |
| 1.1.1 | 8 / 7 | |
| 1.1.0 | 8 / 7 | |
| 1.0.0 | 8 / 7 |
v4.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.