@chakra-ui/focus-lock
React focus lock for all Chakra components
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Monorepo release tooling variance for trusted Chakra UI publisher, not a compromise signal. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Long-lived established package with consistent trusted publisher history. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New dep is official first-party @chakra-ui sibling package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:react-focus-lock | AI (phantom-deps): Thin wrapper re-exports react-focus-lock; expected pattern for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/utils | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org util dep, likely used indirectly/type-only. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Chakra UI packages consistently lack provenance attestation; stable false positive for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 19 of 19)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.17 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.16 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.15 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.14 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.13 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.12 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.11 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.10 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.9 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.8 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.7 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.6 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.5 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.4 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.3 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 2 / 1 |
v2.0.16
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.15
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.14
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.13
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.12
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.11
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.