@chakra-ui/image
React component for progressive image loading
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Monorepo publish tooling artifact, consistent across chakra-ui packages. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New dep is an official first-party @chakra-ui package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/hooks | AI (phantom-deps): Internal same-org monorepo dependency, expected. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/utils | AI (phantom-deps): Internal same-org monorepo dependency, expected. | ai | |
| source-diff | source-size-dropped | AI (source-diff): Monorepo publish artifact quirk, not a stub replacement given trusted publisher/history. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/shared-utils | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped dep; phantom-dep heuristic fires on indirect/re-exported usage common in Chakra UI monorepo packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 18 of 18)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 2 / 4 | |
| 2.0.16 | 2 / 4 | |
| 2.0.15 | 2 / 4 | |
| 2.0.14 | 2 / 4 | |
| 2.0.13 | 2 / 4 | |
| 2.0.12 | 1 / 5 | |
| 2.0.11 | 1 / 5 | |
| 2.0.10 | 1 / 4 | |
| 2.0.9 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.8 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.7 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.6 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.5 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.4 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.3 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 2 / 2 |
v2.0.15
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.14
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.13
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.12
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.11
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.