← Home

@chakra-ui/media-query

A React hook for changing properties or visibility of a component based on css media query

11
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

segunadebayo_codebender828

Keywords

chakra uibreakpointmatchMediareactresponsiveviewport

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
publish-pattern new-deps-added AI (publish-pattern): New deps are official @chakra-ui sibling packages replacing removed @chakra-ui/utils. ai
publish-pattern dormant-publish AI (publish-pattern): Monorepo lockstep release pattern from long-trusted publisher, not account takeover. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/utils AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo dep, used indirectly via workspace build. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/react-env AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo dep, used indirectly via workspace build. ai
source-diff source-size-dropped AI (source-diff): Monorepo publish/build variance, not a stub replacement given trusted publisher. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Chakra UI monorepo packages consistently lack provenance; stable false positive for this package family. ai

Versions (showing 11 of 11)

Version Deps Published
3.3.0 3 / 8
3.2.12 3 / 8
3.2.11 3 / 8
3.2.2 2 / 8
3.2.1 2 / 8
3.2.0 2 / 5
3.1.2 2 / 5
3.1.0 2 / 5
3.0.2 2 / 5
3.0.1 2 / 5
3.0.0 2 / 5

v3.2.11

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.2.2

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.2.1

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.2.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.1.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.1.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.