@chakra-ui/menu
A React component to render accessible menus
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Monorepo publish tooling artifact; no behavior change, well-established publisher. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New deps are official same-org @chakra-ui/* utility packages from monorepo split. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/utils | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/popper | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/descendant | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/react-utils | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/clickable | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/hooks | AI (phantom-deps): Monorepo sibling re-export pattern, same org scope. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/transition | AI (phantom-deps): Internal monorepo dep; phantom-dep false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 32 of 32)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2.1 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.2.0 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.15 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.14 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.13 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.12 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.11 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.10 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.9 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.8 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.7 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.6 | 15 / 11 | |
| 2.1.5 | 14 / 12 | |
| 2.1.4 | 14 / 12 | |
| 2.1.3 | 14 / 12 | |
| 2.1.2 | 14 / 12 | |
| 2.1.1 | 14 / 12 | |
| 2.1.0 | 14 / 11 | |
| 2.0.13 | 14 / 11 | |
| 2.0.12 | 14 / 11 | |
| 2.0.11 | 14 / 11 | |
| 2.0.10 | 7 / 10 | |
| 2.0.9 | 7 / 10 | |
| 2.0.8 | 7 / 10 | |
| 2.0.7 | 7 / 10 | |
| 2.0.6 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.5 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.4 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.3 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.2 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.1 | 7 / 3 | |
| 2.0.0 | 7 / 3 |
v2.2.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.14
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.13
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.12
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.11
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.6
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.5
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.4
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.3
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.2
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.1
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.13
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.12
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.11
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.