@chakra-ui/spinner
A React component for displaying spinners and loaders
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/utils | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling dependency, expected pattern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@chakra-ui/visually-hidden | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling dependency, expected pattern. | ai | |
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Monorepo publish tooling variance, unchanged provenance direction, trusted publisher. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established Chakra UI monorepo package; lack of provenance is consistent across all versions and not a risk indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.0 | 1 / 4 | |
| 2.0.13 | 1 / 4 | |
| 2.0.12 | 1 / 4 | |
| 2.0.11 | 0 / 5 | |
| 2.0.10 | 0 / 5 | |
| 2.0.9 | 0 / 4 | |
| 2.0.8 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.7 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.6 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.5 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.4 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.3 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 2 / 2 |
v2.0.12
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.11
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.10
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.9
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.8
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.7
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: segunadebayo.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.