@checkstack/integration-webhook-backend
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/automation-backend | AI (dependencies): Same-org @checkstack scoped package; consistent with other first-party deps in this ecosystem. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/backend-api | AI (dependencies): Same-org @checkstack scoped dependency; consistent across versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/integration-backend | AI (dependencies): Same-org @checkstack scoped dependency; consistent across versions. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Internal monorepo package; no public-facing description needed. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal @checkstack scoped package; sparse metadata is expected for private org packages, not a spam/malware signal. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@checkstack/integration-common | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org scoped package; declared in dependencies, likely used transitively or via re-export pattern. | ai |
Versions (showing 18 of 18)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.0 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.32 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.31 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.30 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.29 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.28 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.26 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.21 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.19 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.18 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.17 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.16 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.12 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.11 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.5 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.4 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.3 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.0.2 | 5 / 4 |
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.32
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.29
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.28
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.26
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: enyineer.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.21
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: enyineer.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: enyineer.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: enyineer.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: enyineer.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.