@checkstack/queue-bullmq-backend
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Workspace package; missing description is expected for internal monorepo modules. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:Elastic-2.0 | AI (license): Elastic-2.0 is a legitimate open-source license; stable for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/queue-api | AI (dependencies): Workspace-scoped internal monorepo dep; not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/backend-api | AI (dependencies): Workspace-scoped internal monorepo dep; not a third-party risk. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all @checkstack/* packages; no CI provenance setup in this ecosystem. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal monorepo component; sparse metadata is expected and not indicative of spam/malware. | ai |
Versions (showing 42 of 42)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4.7 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.6 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.5 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.4 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.3 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.2 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.1 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.4.0 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.7 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.6 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.5 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.4 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.3 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.2 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.1 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.3.0 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.18 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.17 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.16 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.15 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.14 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.13 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.12 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.11 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.10 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.9 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.8 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.7 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.6 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.3 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.2 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.1 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.2.0 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.5 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.4 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.3 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.2 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.1 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.1.0 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.0.4 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.0.3 | 6 / 4 | |
| 0.0.2 | 6 / 4 |
v0.4.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.