@checkstack/test-utils-backend
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/queue-api | AI (dependencies): Workspace-scoped monorepo sibling; not an external dependency risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@checkstack/backend-api | AI (dependencies): Workspace-scoped monorepo sibling; not an external dependency risk. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal @checkstack scoped tooling package; missing metadata is expected for private org packages. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Internal tooling package; missing description is consistent across the @checkstack ecosystem. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Internal org package; provenance not configured for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 25 of 25)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.38 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.37 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.36 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.35 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.34 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.33 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.32 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.31 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.30 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.29 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.28 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.27 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.26 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.25 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.24 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.23 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.21 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.20 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.16 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.9 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.8 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.5 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.4 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.1 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.0.3 | 4 / 4 |
v0.1.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.21
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.