@ckeditor/ckeditor5-easy-image
Easy Image feature for CKEditor 5.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@ckeditor/ckeditor5-core | AI (dependencies): Sibling @ckeditor monorepo package pinned to same version; part of the official CKEditor 5 release bundle. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@ckeditor/ckeditor5-image | AI (dependencies): Sibling @ckeditor monorepo package pinned to same version; part of the official CKEditor 5 release bundle. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@ckeditor/ckeditor5-utils | AI (dependencies): Sibling @ckeditor monorepo package pinned to same version; part of the official CKEditor 5 release bundle. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@ckeditor/ckeditor5-upload | AI (dependencies): Sibling @ckeditor monorepo package pinned to same version; part of the official CKEditor 5 release bundle. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@ckeditor/ckeditor5-cloud-services | AI (dependencies): Sibling @ckeditor monorepo package pinned to same version; part of the official CKEditor 5 release bundle. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established CKEditor 5 monorepo package; CKSource does not use Sigstore provenance attestation — consistent across all versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 48.2.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.5.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.4.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.3.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.2.0 | 5 / 0 |
v48.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v48.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.7.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.6.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.6.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.