@ckeditor/ckeditor5-editor-inline
Inline editor implementation for CKEditor 5.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:build/editor-inline.js | AI (source-diff): Standard webpack/bundler minified build output with CKSource copyright header; expected for CKEditor packages. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): CKEditor publishes from a large monorepo and has not adopted Sigstore provenance; this is consistent across all their 1500+ package versions and is not a security concern. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.md | AI (license): CKEditor uses a well-known dual commercial/open-source license model; the license format is standard for this publisher across all their packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 48.2.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.2 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.7.1 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.7.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.6.2 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.6.1 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.6.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.5.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.4.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.3.0 | 6 / 0 | |
| 47.2.0 | 6 / 0 |
v48.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v48.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.7.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.1
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.6.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.6.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.