@ckeditor/ckeditor5-paragraph
Paragraph feature for CKEditor 5.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): CKEditor5 is a large, established monorepo package from CKSource; lack of Sigstore provenance is consistent with their historical publishing workflow and poses no meaningful risk. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.md | AI (license): CKEditor5 uses a well-known GPL/commercial dual-license model referenced via LICENSE.md; this is standard for all @ckeditor packages and not a security concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 48.2.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.1.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 48.0.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.7.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.6.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.5.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.4.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.3.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 47.2.0 | 5 / 0 |
v48.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v48.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v48.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.7.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.6.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v47.6.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v47.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.