@cleartrip/ct-design-badge
Badge component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Large org-level team rotation at Cleartrip; consistent with internal team changes across design system packages. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Paired with maintainer-added; reflects org team rotation, not a hostile takeover. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New deps are internal @cleartrip/ct-design-* packages at matching v5.0.0; coordinated major version bump. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@cleartrip/ct-design-container | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org design-system dep; phantom-dep heuristic is a stable false positive for this package family. | ai |
Versions (showing 37 of 37)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 5.15.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.14.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.13.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.12.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.11.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.10.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.9.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.7.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.6.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.5.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.2.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.1.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 5.0.0 | 5 / 2 | |
| 2.22.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.20.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.19.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.18.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.17.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.16.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.16.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.15.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.14.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.13.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.12.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.11.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.10.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.9.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.8.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.7.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.6.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.5.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.4.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.3.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.2.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 3 / 2 |
v5.15.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.14.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.13.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.19.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.18.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (saranshdawra) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-12-23, but saranshdawra is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.17.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.16.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.16.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.15.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.14.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-09-09, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.13.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ashutoshclearip) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-08-08, but ashutoshclearip is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.12.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (bansalraghav19) on 2024-08-06, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.11.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (bansalraghav19) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-08-05, but bansalraghav19 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.10.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-07-30, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ashutoshclearip) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-06-27, but ashutoshclearip is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.6.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-06-25, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.5.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ashutoshclearip) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-06-25, but ashutoshclearip is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.4.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (bansalraghav19) on 2024-06-20, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.3.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (bansalraghav19) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-06-20, but bansalraghav19 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.2.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (sidhantrajan) on 2024-06-10, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.1
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (sidhantrajan) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-06-04, but sidhantrajan is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.1.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (omprakash07) on 2024-06-03, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.