@cleartrip/ct-design-shimmer
Shimmer component
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Cleartrip design system packages consistently lack provenance; stable pattern across 403 versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 30 of 30)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 5.14.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.13.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.12.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.11.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.10.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.9.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.8.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.7.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.6.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.5.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.2.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.1.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 5.0.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.19.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.17.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.16.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.15.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.14.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.13.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.12.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.11.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.10.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.9.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.8.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.7.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.6.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.5.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.4.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.2.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.1.0 | 1 / 1 |
v5.14.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.13.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.12.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.16.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.15.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (saranshdawra) than the most recent previously approved version (gkanishk1) on 2024-12-23, but saranshdawra is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.14.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.13.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.12.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-10-03, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.11.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-09-09, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.10.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (ashutoshclearip) than the most recent previously approved version (bansalraghav19) on 2024-08-08, but ashutoshclearip is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.9.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (bansalraghav19) on 2024-08-06, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.8.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (bansalraghav19) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-08-05, but bansalraghav19 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.7.0
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (gkanishk1) than the most recent previously approved version (ashutoshclearip) on 2024-07-30, but gkanishk1 is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.