← Home

@codaco/fresco-ui

Fresco UI components, styles, and utilities

10
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

jthrillybuckhalt

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): jthrilly is an established publisher in the same org; transition appears legitimate. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:cva AI (dependencies): cva is a well-known class-variance-authority successor; pinned beta version is intentional for this package. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Established @codaco org package; lack of Sigstore attestation is a process gap, not a security signal for this publisher. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@codaco/tailwind-config AI (phantom-deps): Same-org config package; phantom-dep is a false positive for build-time config deps. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): Scoped org-internal UI library; sparse metadata is expected for monorepo packages. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@tiptap/pm AI (phantom-deps): @tiptap/pm is listed as a direct dependency in package.json; phantom-dep is a false positive here. ai

Versions (showing 10 of 10)

Version Deps Published
2.10.0 24 / 28
2.4.0 23 / 27
2.1.0 23 / 26
2.0.1 24 / 25
2.0.0 24 / 24
1.0.0 24 / 24
0.3.0 24 / 24
0.2.1 25 / 24
0.2.0 25 / 24
0.1.1 24 / 24

v2.10.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: buckhalt → jthrilly (on 2026-05-12) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-12. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.4.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: buckhalt → jthrilly (on 2026-05-05) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-05. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: buckhalt → jthrilly (on 2026-05-05) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-05. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v2.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.3.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.2.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v0.1.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.