@codelia/tui-darwin-x64
Platform binary package for codelia TUI (darwin x64)
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): Platform binary sub-package; the compiled binary is the intended artifact, consistent with the darwin-x64 naming pattern. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Platform-split binary sub-packages structurally lack repo links, keywords, deps, and rich READMEs — not a spam indicator for this package type. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 58)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.68 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.67 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.66 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.65 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.64 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.63 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.62 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.61 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.60 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.59 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.58 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.57 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.56 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.55 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.54 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.53 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.52 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.50 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.49 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.48 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.47 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.45 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.44 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.43 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.42 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.41 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.40 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.39 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.38 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.37 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.36 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.35 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.34 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.33 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.32 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.30 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.29 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.28 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.26 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.25 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.24 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.23 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.22 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.21 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.20 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.19 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.18 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.17 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.16 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.15 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.1.13 | 0 / 0 |
v0.1.68
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.67
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.66
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.65
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.64
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.63
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.62
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.61
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.60
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.59
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.58
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.57
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.56
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.55
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.54
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.53
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.52
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.50
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.49
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.48
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.47
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.45
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.44
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.43
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.42
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.41
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.40
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.39
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.38
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.37
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.36
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.35
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.34
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.33
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.32
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.30
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.29
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.28
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.26
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.25
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.24
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.23
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.22
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.21
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.20
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.19
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.18
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.17
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.16
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.15
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.13
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • bin/codelia-tui
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.