@codingame/monaco-vscode-edit-sessions-service-override
VSCode public API plugged on the monaco editor - edit-sessions service-override
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions publisher is consistent with SLSA attestation; CodinGame org CI/CD migration. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Established CodinGame monorepo publisher with 626 approved packages; inactivity gap is benign for this org. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-4a316137-39d1-5d77-8b53-112db3547c1e-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-a8d3bd74-e63e-5327-96e8-4f931661e329-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-dbfe5f85-b426-55ed-a79b-5f811b395762-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-f22e7e55-aee8-5b52-a6bc-950efd9f5890-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-d941ac7b-412f-57e3-b1bf-f6b0eb253b21-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@codingame/monaco-vscode-249dc928-1da3-51c1-82d0-45e0ba9d08a1-common | AI (dependencies): Internal monorepo sub-package from CodinGame; UUID naming is a consistent code-splitting pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established CodinGame package family; lack of provenance is consistent across all versions and not a risk indicator here. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 57)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0.7 | 1 / 0 | |
| 33.0.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 33.0.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 32.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 32.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 32.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 31.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 31.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 30.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 30.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 29.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 29.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 29.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.4.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.4.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.3.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.3.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 28.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 27.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.2.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 26.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 25.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 25.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 25.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 25.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 25.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 24.3.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 24.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 24.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 24.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 23.3.0 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.2.2 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.2.1 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.2.0 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.1.1 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.1.0 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.0.4 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.0.3 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.0.2 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.0.1 | 7 / 0 | |
| 23.0.0 | 7 / 0 |
v33.0.7
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-23. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v33.0.6
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v33.0.5
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v32.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v32.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v32.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v31.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v31.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v30.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v29.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v29.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v29.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v28.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v28.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v27.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v26.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v25.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v25.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v25.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v25.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v25.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v24.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v24.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v23.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v23.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.