@combos-fun/plugin-development-tool
Scene / tagged object tap development tool: outline overlay and parent postMessage
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Metadata-only signal; no behavioral change in this version, consistent monorepo publish pattern. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | rapid-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Lockstep versioning across multiple @combos-fun packages explains rapid publish cadence. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is common; no other risk signals present for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 33 of 33)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.35 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.34 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.0.33 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.32 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.31 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.30 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.29 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.28 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.27 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.26 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.25 | 4 / 1 | |
| 0.0.24 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.23 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.22 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.21 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.20 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.19 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.18 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.17 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.16 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.15 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.0.14 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.13 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.12 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.11 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.10 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.9 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.8 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.7 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.6 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.4 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.0.3 | 3 / 0 |
v0.0.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.32
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.31
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.30
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.29
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.28
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.27
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: sun668.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.