@cometchat/chat-sdk-javascript
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): All new maintainers have cometchat-aligned usernames; consistent with org-level maintainer expansion. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:new-function-constructor | AI (semgrep): Fires in minified bundle entry point; standard pattern for bundled SDKs, not a dynamic code injection risk. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): No-deps and link-dump README are expected for a self-contained bundled SDK; not spam indicators here. | ai |
Versions (showing 23 of 23)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.1.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.14 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 4.0.6 | 0 / 0 |
v4.1.13
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (prajwaldhule) than the most recent previously approved version (aanshi04) on 2026-07-25, but prajwaldhule is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.1.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.12
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rajdubey) than the most recent previously approved version (mathews_cometchat) on 2025-04-23, but rajdubey is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.0.11
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (rajdubey) than the most recent previously approved version (mathews_cometchat) on 2025-04-02, but rajdubey is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.9
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (mathews_cometchat) than the most recent previously approved version (ritikkaushiknpm) on 2024-08-08, but mathews_cometchat is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v4.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.