@contentful/field-editor-list
```bash npm install @contentful/field-editor-list ```
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): @emotion/css is the canonical Emotion v11 package; direct replacement for removed `emotion` dep, no risk. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Contentful org migrated publishing to GitHub Actions CI; consistent with official repo and no code changes. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@contentful/f36-components | AI (dependencies): First-party Contentful UI component library; stable dependency across all versions of this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Official Contentful org package published via GitHub Actions; provenance absence is common and not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 21 of 21)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.1.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.13 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.12 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.11 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.10 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.9 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.8 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.7 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.6 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.5 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.4 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 4 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.7.5 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.7.4 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.7.3 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.7.2 | 4 / 1 | |
| 1.7.1 | 4 / 1 |
v2.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-02-23. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.7.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.