@ddd-ts/event-sourcing-inmemory
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Scoped monorepo package; no description is a stable pattern across all versions. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions CI publishing is consistent with monorepo automation; SLSA attestation corroborates legitimacy. | ai | |
| provenance | slsa-provenance | AI (provenance): Package consistently published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation; stable for this monorepo. | ai | |
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Transition to GitHub Actions CI publish flow explains missing gitHead; SLSA provenance compensates. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Tiny payload is expected for a monorepo sub-package re-export; not a spam indicator here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@ddd-ts/core | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; phantom-dep heuristic unreliable for re-export packages. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@ddd-ts/shape | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@ddd-ts/store-inmemory | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@ddd-ts/types | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org monorepo sibling; declared as runtime dep, phantom-dep heuristic is a false positive here. | ai |
Versions (showing 37 of 37)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.49 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.48 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.47 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.46 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.45 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.44 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.43 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.42 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.41 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.40 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.39 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.38 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.37 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.36 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.35 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.34 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.33 | 4 / 6 | |
| 0.0.32 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.31 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.30 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.29 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.28 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.27 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.26 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.25 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.24 | 3 / 6 | |
| 0.0.23 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.22 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.21 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.20 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.19 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.18 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.17 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.16 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.15 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.14 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.13 | 3 / 5 |
v0.0.49
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.0.48
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.0.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.26
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.25
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.21
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.