@devvit/test
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Internal SDK testing utility in @devvit monorepo; sparse metadata is expected for this package type. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Internal monorepo package; missing description is consistent across all @devvit/* packages. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:jest | AI (typosquat): @devvit/test is a scoped SDK package in the devvit monorepo, not a typosquat of jest. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:next | AI (typosquat): @devvit/test is a scoped SDK package in the devvit monorepo, not a typosquat of next. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:vitest | AI (typosquat): @devvit/test is a scoped SDK package in the devvit monorepo, not a typosquat of vitest. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:api-obfuscation-reflect | AI (semgrep): Reflect.get() used in a Proxy trap to wrap vitest test API — standard JS pattern, not obfuscation. | ai |
Versions (showing 21 of 21)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.13.2 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.13.0 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.24 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.23 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.22 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.21 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.20 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.19 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.18 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.17 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.16 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.15 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.14 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.13 | 13 / 5 | |
| 0.12.12 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.11 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.10 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.9 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.8 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.7 | 12 / 5 | |
| 0.12.6 | 12 / 5 |
v0.13.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.13.0
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (colacadstink) than the most recent previously approved version (devvit-cli-bot) on 2026-05-26, but colacadstink is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v0.12.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.12.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.12.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.