@difizen/libro-search-code-cell
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@difizen/mana-app | AI (dependencies): Core difizen ecosystem dependency; stable pattern across all libro packages. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@difizen/libro-core | AI (dependencies): Sibling monorepo package; consistent across all libro releases. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established monorepo package; lack of provenance is consistent across all 225 versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 4 of 104)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.37 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.36 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.35 | 6 / 0 | |
| 0.1.34 | 6 / 0 |
v0.1.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.