@diia-inhouse/test
test-utils
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/stubs/photo.js | AI (source-diff): Long line is a Base64-encoded PNG image used as a test stub, not obfuscated malicious code. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:jest | AI (typosquat): @diia-inhouse/test is a scoped package from Ukraine's official Diia gov-tech org; the name reflects its purpose, not impersonation of jest. Stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:next | AI (typosquat): Scoped @diia-inhouse namespace with 688-day history and GitHub repo; no relation to next.js. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:vitest | AI (typosquat): Package legitimately wraps vitest as a test utility; the name similarity is intentional and descriptive, not a typosquat. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@diia-inhouse/design-system | AI (dependencies): Intra-org dependency from the same @diia-inhouse namespace; expected for Diia ecosystem packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 37 of 37)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 8.2.6 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.5 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.4 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.3 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.2 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.1 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.2.0 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.1.4 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.0.2 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.0.1 | 9 / 16 | |
| 8.0.0 | 9 / 16 | |
| 7.3.24 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.23 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.21 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.20 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.19 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.18 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.17 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.16 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.15 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.14 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.13 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.12 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.11 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.10 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.9 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.8 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.7 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.6 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.5 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.4 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.3 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.2 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.1 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.3.0 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.2.1 | 9 / 12 | |
| 7.2.0 | 9 / 12 |
v8.2.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.2.0
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.1.4
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v8.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.23
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.18
2 findingsPackage name '@diia-inhouse/test' is 1 edit(s) away from popular package 'jest'.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.16
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v7.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v7.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.