@divi/right-click-options
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Elegant Themes packages consistently lack Sigstore provenance; stable false positive for this publisher. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/seamless-immutable | AI (phantom-deps): Type-only package; @types/* deps are used by convention/tooling, not direct imports. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.6 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.4 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 4 / 0 |
v1.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.