@done-coding/cli-component
组件命令行工具
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New dep is same-org package replacing lodash utilities; consistent with internal refactor pattern for this package family. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all 59 versions; org does not use Sigstore attestation. | ai |
Versions (showing 36 of 36)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6.1 | 2 / 8 | |
| 0.6.0 | 2 / 8 | |
| 0.5.4 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.5.3 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.5.2 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.5.1 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.5.0 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.4.12 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.4.11 | 7 / 11 | |
| 0.4.9 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.8 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.7 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.6 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.5 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.4 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.2 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.1 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.4.0 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.11 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.10 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.8 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.6 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.5 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.4 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.3.3 | 7 / 12 | |
| 0.2.2 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.2.1 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.2.0 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.8 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.7 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.6 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.5 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.4 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.3 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.2 | 12 / 16 | |
| 0.1.1 | 12 / 16 |
v0.2.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.