← Home

@dotcms/analytics

npm Repository Homepage

Official JavaScript library for Content Analytics with DotCMS.

12
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

nollymardevdotcms

Keywords

dotCMSCMSContent ManagementAnalyticsTracking

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@dotcms/uve AI (phantom-deps): Same org scope (@dotcms); likely a peer/runtime dep used indirectly, not a phantom. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@analytics/core AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files per finding; stable false positive for this analytics package. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@analytics/storage-utils AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files per finding; stable false positive for this analytics package. ai

Versions (showing 12 of 12)

Version Deps Published
1.6.0 6 / 4
1.5.6 6 / 4
1.5.4 6 / 4
1.5.2 6 / 4
1.5.0 6 / 4
1.4.0 6 / 4
1.2.0 5 / 4
1.0.6 4 / 4
1.0.5 4 / 4
1.0.4 4 / 4
1.0.3 3 / 3
1.0.0 1 / 3

v1.6.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.5.6

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.5.4

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: nollymar → devdotcms (on 2026-05-12, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (devdotcms) than the most recent previously approved version (nollymar) on 2026-05-12, but devdotcms is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v1.5.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.5.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.4.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.2.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.6

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.4

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.3

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.