@dotcms/experiments
Official JavaScript library to use Experiments with DotCMS.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): nollymar is a known dotCMS org member with clean track record; publisher change reflects internal team transition. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): nollymar has 21 approved packages and is part of the dotCMS org; stable maintainer addition. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@jitsu/sdk-js | AI (dependencies): @jitsu/sdk-js is a legitimate analytics SDK; appropriate dependency for an A/B testing experiments library. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established dotCMS SDK package; lack of provenance is common and not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 19 of 19)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.5.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.5.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.5.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.5.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.4.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.3.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.2.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 1 / 0 |
v1.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.5.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.4
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (devdotcms) than the most recent previously approved version (nollymar) on 2026-05-12, but devdotcms is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.5.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.2.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-02-11. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.3
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-01-26. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.2
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-01-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-12-11. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.