@dreamkit/dev
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established monorepo package; no provenance is consistent across all versions. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:ajv | AI (typosquat): Scoped @dreamkit package; Levenshtein match to 'ajv' is coincidental, not a squatting attempt. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@dreamkit/utils | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling dep; phantom-dep heuristic is a stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/babel__traverse | AI (phantom-deps): Type-only package loaded by convention; not directly imported but legitimately declared. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/babel__generator | AI (phantom-deps): Type-only package loaded by convention; not directly imported but legitimately declared. | ai |
Versions (showing 26 of 26)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.58 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.57 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.55 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.52 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.51 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.47 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.45 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.44 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.39 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.38 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.37 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.36 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.35 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.34 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.33 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.31 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.30 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.28 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.27 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.26 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.25 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.22 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.20 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.19 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.18 | 20 / 5 | |
| 0.0.17 | 20 / 5 |
v0.0.58
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.57
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.55
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.52
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.51
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.47
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.45
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.44
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.39
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.36
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.34
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.28
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.27
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.26
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.25
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.20
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.18
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.