@dreamkit/solid
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@dreamkit/ioc | AI (phantom-deps): @dreamkit/ioc is a declared runtime dep in the same org scope; phantom-dep heuristic false positive for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@dreamkit/utils | AI (dependencies): Same monorepo/publisher (juanrgm/dreamkit); consistent internal dependency pattern across approved versions. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Consistent across all 60 versions; no provenance is the norm for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 27 of 27)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0.51 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.50 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.48 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.47 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.42 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.36 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.24 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.23 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.21 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.20 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.18 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.17 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.16 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.15 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.14 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.12 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.11 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.10 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.9 | 4 / 5 | |
| 0.0.8 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.7 | 3 / 5 | |
| 0.0.6 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.0.5 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.0.4 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.0.3 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.0.2 | 3 / 4 | |
| 0.0.1 | 3 / 4 |
v0.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.