← Home

@duetds/icons

This package includes Duet Design System Icons and related utilities.

84
Versions
SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.md
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

lahitapiolalennukasimir-dkaeremannistoleodka

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
source-diff obfuscated-file:lib/assets/e-invoice.js AI (source-diff): Long line is SVG path data in an icon asset, not obfuscated code. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): Stale publisher change (498d), trusted publisher track record, no behavioral change. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-removed AI (maintainer-change): Consistent with legitimate handoff, not takeover, per provenance timing. ai
provenance publisher-changed-stale AI (provenance): Long-stable publish (498d) rules out takeover pattern. ai
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Publisher lahitapiola matches the package's author org (LocalTapiola); consistent with internal account migration. ai
typosquat typosquat.levenshtein:cors AI (typosquat): Established scoped design-system icons package; Levenshtein match to 'cors' is coincidental and not a typosquat. ai

Versions (showing 84 of 84)

Version Deps Published
4.3.6 0 / 8
4.3.5 0 / 8
4.3.4 0 / 8
4.3.3 0 / 8
4.3.2 0 / 8
4.3.1 0 / 8
4.3.0 0 / 8
4.2.14 0 / 8
4.2.13 0 / 8
4.2.12 0 / 8
4.2.11 0 / 8
4.2.10 0 / 8
4.2.9 0 / 8
4.2.8 0 / 8
4.2.7 0 / 8
4.2.6 0 / 8
4.2.5 0 / 8
4.2.4 0 / 8
4.2.3 0 / 8
4.2.2 0 / 8
4.2.1 0 / 8
4.2.0 0 / 8
4.1.23 0 / 8
4.1.22 0 / 8
4.1.21 0 / 8
4.1.20 0 / 8
4.1.19 0 / 8
4.1.18 0 / 8
4.1.17 0 / 8
4.1.16 0 / 8
4.1.15 0 / 8
4.1.14 0 / 8
4.1.13 0 / 8
4.1.12 0 / 8
4.1.11 0 / 8
4.1.10 0 / 8
4.1.9 0 / 8
4.1.8 0 / 8
4.1.7 0 / 8
4.1.6 0 / 8
4.1.5 0 / 8
4.1.4 0 / 8
4.1.3 0 / 8
4.1.2 0 / 8
4.1.1 0 / 8
4.1.0 0 / 8
4.0.74 0 / 8
4.0.73 0 / 8
4.0.72 0 / 8
4.0.71 0 / 8
4.0.70 0 / 8
4.0.69 0 / 8
4.0.68 0 / 8
4.0.67 0 / 8
4.0.66 0 / 8
4.0.65 0 / 8
4.0.64 0 / 8
4.0.63 0 / 8
4.0.62 0 / 8
4.0.61 0 / 8
4.0.60 0 / 8
4.0.59 0 / 8
4.0.58 0 / 8
4.0.57 0 / 8
4.0.56 0 / 8
4.0.55 0 / 8
4.0.54 0 / 8
4.0.53 0 / 8
4.0.52 0 / 8
4.0.51 0 / 8
4.0.50 0 / 9
4.0.49 0 / 9
4.0.48 0 / 9
4.0.47 0 / 9
4.0.46 0 / 9
4.0.45 0 / 9
4.0.44 0 / 9
4.0.43 0 / 9
4.0.42 0 / 9
4.0.41 0 / 9
4.0.40 0 / 9
4.0.39 0 / 9
4.0.38 0 / 10
4.0.37 0 / 10

v4.3.6

3 findings
HIGH New obfuscated file: lib/assets/e-invoice.js source-diff

Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: kasimir-dka → lahitapiola (on 2026-07-01, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (kasimir-dka) on 2026-07-01, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.3.5

3 findings
HIGH New obfuscated file: lib/assets/e-invoice.js source-diff

Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: kasimir-dka → lahitapiola (on 2026-06-29, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (kasimir-dka) on 2026-06-29, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.72

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: lahitapiola → kasimir-dka (on 2025-04-30, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (kasimir-dka) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2025-04-30, but kasimir-dka is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.71

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.70

2 findings
MEDIUM Publisher changed: lahitapiola → kasimir-dka (on 2025-03-31, unremoved on npm for 473d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (kasimir-dka) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2025-03-31. It has since remained available on npm for 473 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.69

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.68

2 findings
MEDIUM Publisher changed: lahitapiola → kasimir-dka (on 2025-03-13, unremoved on npm for 491d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (kasimir-dka) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2025-03-13. It has since remained available on npm for 491 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.67

2 findings
MEDIUM Publisher changed: lahitapiola → kasimir-dka (on 2025-03-06, unremoved on npm for 498d) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (kasimir-dka) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2025-03-06. It has since remained available on npm for 498 days without being unpublished, which is inconsistent with an account takeover — those are typically removed by npm shortly after discovery.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.66

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gibasm → lahitapiola (on 2025-02-20, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (gibasm) on 2025-02-20, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.65

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gibasm → lahitapiola (on 2025-02-05, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (gibasm) on 2025-02-05, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.64

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.63

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gibasm → lahitapiola (on 2025-01-20, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (gibasm) on 2025-01-20, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.62

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: lahitapiola → gibasm (on 2025-01-16, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gibasm) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2025-01-16, but gibasm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.61

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.60

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.59

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.58

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.57

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.56

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.55

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: lahitapiola → gibasm (on 2024-11-05, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gibasm) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2024-11-05, but gibasm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.54

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.53

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: lahitapiola → gibasm (on 2024-10-21, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gibasm) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2024-10-21, but gibasm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.52

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.51

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.50

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.49

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.48

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.47

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.46

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gibasm → lahitapiola (on 2024-06-24, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (gibasm) on 2024-06-24, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.45

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.44

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: lahitapiola → gibasm (on 2024-06-06, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (gibasm) than the most recent previously approved version (lahitapiola) on 2024-06-06, but gibasm is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.43

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.42

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: gibasm → lahitapiola (on 2024-06-03, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (lahitapiola) than the most recent previously approved version (gibasm) on 2024-06-03, but lahitapiola is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v4.0.41

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.40

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.39

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.38

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v4.0.37

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.