@dynamic-labs-wallet/svm
3
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
No SLSA provenance
npm registry signatures
No source commit
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
packaging-at-dynamic-labs
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Consistent across Dynamic Labs scoped packages; not an indicator of malice for this publisher. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Dynamic Labs packages consistently lack provenance attestation; not a risk signal for this org. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:hex-decode | AI (semgrep): Hex decoding is used to parse raw Solana public keys for bs58 encoding — standard wallet SDK operation, not obfuscation. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped monorepo package published via CI; missing metadata is typical for internal SDK sub-packages. | ai |
v0.0.67
1 finding
LOW
No provenance attestation
provenance
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.66
1 finding
INFO
No provenance attestation
provenance
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 finding
INFO
No provenance attestation
provenance
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.