@elizaos/plugin-suno — Greenflagged

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

shawticusshakkernerdwtfsayoodilitimecjft

Keywords

elizaospluginsunoaimusicaudiogeneration

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

Source	Rule	Reason	Accepted by	When
phantom-deps	phantom-dep:zod	AI (phantom-deps): zod used indirectly via config/schema, common false positive for validation libs.	ai	2026/07/07
publish-pattern	new-deps-added	AI (publish-pattern): zod is a well-known, widely-vetted validation library.	ai	2026/07/07

Versions (showing 2 of 2)

Version	Deps	Published
1.0.5	2 / 6	2025-07-04
0.1.9	1 / 5	2025-02-01

v1.0.5

3 findings

HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: shawticus.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: shakkernerd → shawticus (on 2025-07-04, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (shawticus) than the most recent previously approved version (shakkernerd) on 2025-07-04, but shawticus is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v0.1.9

1 finding

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.