← Home

@ensdomains/buffer

npm

[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.com/ensdomains/buffer.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.com/ensdomains/buffer) [![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-BSD--2--Clause-blue.svg)](LICENSE)

9
Versions
BSD-2-Clause
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source, so a manually published version cannot be tied back to a reviewed commit.

Maintainers

makoto_inouenickjohnsonjefflaumdt.leeondamikytaytemsadraffyv1rtl

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Manual publish by known maintainer, consistent with prior pattern. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:@nomiclabs/hardhat-truffle5 AI (dependencies): Official Nomic Labs Hardhat plugin, standard build tooling. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): New maintainers are known ENS team members, consistent with org transfer. ai

Versions (showing 9 of 9)

Version Deps Published
0.1.3 0 / 13
0.1.0 1 / 12
0.0.12 1 / 11
0.0.10 0 / 3
0.0.9 0 / 3
0.0.8 0 / 3
0.0.7 0 / 3
0.0.6 0 / 3
0.0.5 0 / 3

v0.1.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.12

3 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: makoto_inoue.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: nickjohnson → makoto_inoue (on 2021-05-28, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (makoto_inoue) than the most recent previously approved version (nickjohnson) on 2021-05-28, but makoto_inoue is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v0.0.10

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.9

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.8

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.7

2 findings
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: decanus → nickjohnson (on 2019-03-12, known maintainer) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account (nickjohnson) than the most recent previously approved version (decanus) on 2019-03-12, but nickjohnson is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.

v0.0.6

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.5

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.