@entur/form
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Org team account takeover on a long-lived @entur scoped package; consistent with internal team restructuring. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-removed | AI (maintainer-change): Paired with team account addition; no malicious indicators in diff or metadata. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@entur/utils | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @entur design-system monorepo. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@entur/button | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @entur design-system monorepo. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@entur/typography | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @entur design-system monorepo. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@entur/tooltip | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @entur design-system monorepo. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@entur/icons | AI (dependencies): Sibling package in the same @entur design-system monorepo. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:cors | AI (typosquat): @entur/form is a scoped design-system package; Levenshtein match to 'cors' is a false positive. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 16)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 9.3.4 | 7 / 10 | |
| 9.3.3 | 7 / 10 | |
| 9.3.2 | 7 / 10 | |
| 9.3.1 | 7 / 10 | |
| 9.3.0 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.7 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.6 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.5 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.4 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.3 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.2 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.1 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.2.0 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.1.0 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.0.1 | 7 / 11 | |
| 9.0.0 | 7 / 11 |
v9.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v9.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v9.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.