@eva/spine-base
@eva/spine-base
2
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
No SLSA provenance
npm registry signatures
gitHead linked
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
aspsndaz8641683bezoswiseyurijimizaiterrykingcha
Keywords
eva.js
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@eva/inspector-decorator | AI (dependencies): Sibling @eva-scoped package used consistently across the eva.js ecosystem; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Part of the established EVA.js monorepo; sparse README is typical for internal plugin packages. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Long-lived package predating Sigstore provenance adoption; no provenance is expected for this org. | ai |
v2.0.0
1 finding
INFO
No provenance attestation
provenance
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.