@everymatrix/lottery-tipping-page
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/lottery-tipping-page/lottery-tipping-page-b611e76d.js | AI (source-diff): Standard Stencil build output; minified but readable, no malicious patterns. Stable for this package family. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:dist/cjs/general-multi-select_15.cjs.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Network calls are styling/stream subscriptions; dynamic code execution is Stencil registerInstance — standard component framework pattern. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/esm/general-multi-select_15.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Same Stencil ESM build artifact; minified CSS strings trigger long-line heuristic, not actual obfuscation. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:dist/esm/general-multi-select_15.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Same pattern as CJS variant; Stencil framework calls, not dropper behavior. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/lottery-tipping-page/general-multi-select_15.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Third build target of the same Stencil component; minified but readable UI logic visible in sample. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:dist/lottery-tipping-page/general-multi-select_15.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Same Stencil component pattern; getAssetPath/setClientStyling are UI framework calls, not malware. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/cjs/general-multi-select_15.cjs.entry.js | AI (source-diff): Stencil.js minified build artifact; long lines are minified CSS strings and component logic, not obfuscation. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/lottery-tipping-page/lottery-tipping-page-92169e63.js | AI (source-diff): Minified Stencil/Rollup build artifact; pattern is consistent across all versions of this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): No provenance is consistent across this package's publishing history; low risk for an internal widget library. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Stable pattern across all versions of this everymatrix widget package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Scoped monorepo widget package; sparse metadata and empty entry point are consistent with 255-version CI publishing pattern. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 114)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94.31 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.30 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.29 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.28 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.27 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.26 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.25 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.24 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.23 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.22 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.21 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.20 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.19 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.18 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.17 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.16 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.15 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.94.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.15 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.14 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.93.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.92.1 | 0 / 0 |
v1.94.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.16
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (goe.suta) than the most recent previously approved version (adrian.pripon) on 2026-05-26, but goe.suta is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.94.15
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
This version was published by a different npm account (goe.suta) than the most recent previously approved version (adrian.pripon) on 2026-05-26, but goe.suta is listed as a maintainer on prior approved versions (matched on name). This looks like a manual publish by a known maintainer rather than a publisher change. Recorded as INFO for audit trail.
v1.94.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.8
7 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.7
7 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.6
7 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.5
7 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.94.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.93.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.92.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.